| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
- Artby - Amy Eisenberg (10)
- Artby - Guest Contributor (2)
- Artby - Jay Taber (45)
- Artby - Mirjam Hirch (66)
- Artby - Randolph Bowers (2)
- Artby - Renee Davis (10)
- Artby - Rudolph Ryser (115)
- Artby - Tiffany Waters (1)
- Arts and Culture (42)
- Daily (964)
- Economy (18)
- Environment (54)
- FW Geo-Politics (70)
- Health (31)
- Human Rights (31)
- Law & Justice (11)
- Media (8)
- People (20)
- Political (33)
- Political Economy (14)
- July 31, 2010: Medicine and Knowledge
- July 29, 2010: The Tarnished Past
- July 28, 2010: Trial in Guatemala
- July 28, 2010: Free Expression
- July 27, 2010: Dominating the Mediascape
- July 26, 2010: Multitalking
- July 26, 2010: The Right to Communicate
- July 25, 2010: Growing Up Under Occupation
- July 25, 2010: Seeing Clearly
- July 24, 2010: Inherent Rights
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
“Grand Adaptation Coalition” Needed
Now that the United Nation’s Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Conference is over it is time to consider the best path for indigenous peoples to take to secure their future. While many want to suggest that “Copenhagen was a failure” I agree with former undersecretary of state for global affairs Fank Loy and Council on Foreign Relations fellow for energy and environment Michael Levi. “…change will not come from the present process. The Copenhagen Accord lays a valuable foundation for future action. But, if we are to succeed, that action must primarily happen elsewhere.” In other words, applying this thinking to the situation of indigenous peoples, we must form a grand coalition of indigenous nations to define the predicates for securing the principles for indigenous peoples adaptation locally, at the state level and internationally. Indigenous peoples must establish a global political bloc that speaks “from the ground up” as a single voice to blocs of states’ governments–G-20 for example. The “Grand Adaptaton Coalition” of indigenous peoples must be formed from key indigenous peoples’ governments with the technical support and capabilities of skilled indigenous technicians from non-governmental indigenous organizations and communities. The primary focus of the coalition must be on measures to achieve effective adaption protocols inside each nation and constructive rules in states’ governments that do not undermine the rights and interests of each nation. Such a coalition now will provide an effective spearhead internationally that can stimulate the formation of new international mechanisms for indigenous nations/international states negotiation of an Indigenous Nation’s Adaptation Accord built on the foundation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The Alaska Declaration and the work of the International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Climate Change have established the basic principles on which the work of a Grand Adaptation Coalition will rest. Specific proposals for new international mechanisms have been placed on the table by the International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change and the Quinault Indian Nation. These principles and proposals must now be considered for further development.
Indigenous nations in the United States, Canada and Mexico have a major role to play in the formation of the “Grand Adaption Coalition.” Until now they have played only a minor role in the climate change debate. Recognizing the immensely important contributions of the Indigenous Peoples’ International Centre for Policy Research and Education also known as Tebtebba (…a word used by the indigenous Kankana-ey Igorots of Northern Philippines, refers to a process of collectively discussing issues and presenting diverse views with the aim of reaching agreements, common positions, and concerted actions.) in the Philippines; and its leader Vicky Tauli-Corpuz indigenous leaders of indigenous governments now must step forward a commit themselves and their nations to a vigorous local, state level and international level effort to drive an indigenous agenda on climate change. Failure to add their voices to those coming from indigenous non-governmental organizations will doom indigenous peoples to the whims of states’ government authorities.
My organization, the Center for World Indigenous Studies (CWIS), stands ready to help facilitate formation of a Grand Adaptation Coalition of indigenous nations and indigenous non-governmental organizations. Constructive collaboration and the application of financial resources is now needed to be combined with effective political leadership and skilled technical support. Indigenous peoples can no longer rely on the states’ governments goodwill for there is none to be had. We have a hard nosed race for survival that can only be won if indigenous nations lead their own way. Indigenous political leaders who represent their governments with the power to regulate and set laws must step forward now.

Powered by ScribeFire.
One Response to ““Grand Adaptation Coalition” Needed”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
December 27, 2009 at 1:03 pm
Due to issues of legitimacy, authenticity and integrity, such a coalition must be indigenous driven, but to wield the clout necessary to succeed it must make a way for non-indigenous affinities to express their solidarity. Sinn Fein and the Mapuche both used this model effectively to garner vital outside support for their struggles. CWIS, of course, has a track record of mobilizing a diversity of humanitarian resources for the indigenous peoples’ movement. That network is an essential part of the services it has to offer.