| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
- Artby - Amy Eisenberg (10)
- Artby - Guest Contributor (2)
- Artby - Jay Taber (45)
- Artby - Mirjam Hirch (68)
- Artby - Randolph Bowers (2)
- Artby - Renee Davis (10)
- Artby - Rudolph Ryser (115)
- Artby - Tiffany Waters (1)
- Arts and Culture (42)
- Daily (994)
- Economy (18)
- Environment (54)
- FW Geo-Politics (70)
- Health (33)
- Human Rights (31)
- Law & Justice (11)
- Media (8)
- People (20)
- Political (33)
- Political Economy (14)
- September 1, 2010: Appalling Violence
- August 31, 2010: Chile Today
- August 30, 2010: The Broadband Barrier
- August 29, 2010: Discovering Anishinabe
- August 28, 2010: Australia v Aborigines
- August 27, 2010: Indigenous Doctors Congress 2010
- August 25, 2010: Historical Ignorance
- August 21, 2010: Thick Long Wide Deep
- August 20, 2010: Lughnasa
- August 19, 2010: Seed Money
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Chickens Home to Roost: The Climate is most Foul
“If we don’t take urgent and ambitious action, the reality is that some small island developing states will not be around within a couple of decades - certainly not by the end of the century.”
So spoke Barbados Delegate to the climate change preparatory talks Selwin Hart expressing the frustration of island states’, developing states, Bolivia and indigenous peoples in Barcelona today. Powerful states including the United States of America, United Kingdom and other European countries (UUE) are lined up in opposition to developing states led by South Africa and Bolivia, island states and indigenous peoples (DSBII) on target reductions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The US position presented by Ambassador Todd Stern calls for reduction targets of 9% to 10% by 2020 while the less developed world calls for reductions of 45%. Fearing that lower reduction targets will fail to achieve climate change goals the DSBII have expressed profound frustration with the UUE that are seen as the primary producers of CO2 emissions and the main beneficiaries of wealth generated by such emissions. Echoing the “north-south” debate of a generation ago where rich post-colonial countries were called on to transfer wealth and technical help to former colonial lands the present clash requires developed countries to give up some of their privileges and wealth.
Noting that wealthy states (US and Europe) became wealthy and privileged as a result of colonizing other peoples and territories or outright stealing from what are now considered less developed peoples and countries.
The problem now faced by the UUE states is that they cannot escape the consequences of their profligacy and confiscatory practices anymore than can the DSBII countries. Everyone is in the same boat and those who caused the problem will eventually have to face up to the consequences of their actions. The chickens have come home to roost and now is the time for the privileged and wealthy to step back from their emphasis on accumulating more wealth and power in favor of pragmatism: establishment of a balance between the DSBII and UUE by sharing wealth and compromising in favor of survival.
The common wisdom is that there will only be a political agreement on climate change in December and no treaty that legally binds all states to a common set of goals and practices. The obstacle to success is primarily caused by the United States and European Union failures to establish emission reduction goals compatible with the DSBII. The US has in the Senator Boxer and Senator Kerry climate change and energy legislation proposed in September real possibilities for compromise, but the power brokers, corporations and coal producing states prevent consideration of a strong Bill that would put the United States in the Climate Change negotiations as a real player.
Indigenous peoples have only two alternatives and they are to ally themselves in the negotiations with the BSBII in an effort to win small concessions; and to act on their own to obstruct state actions aimed at creating more CO2 and greenhouse gases. The chickens have come to roost. There is no room for pretending that there is more time to prevent catastrophic climate change.

Powered by ScribeFire.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.