Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Categories
- Artby - Amy Eisenberg (8)
- Artby - Guest Contributor (2)
- Artby - Jay Taber (45)
- Artby - Mirjam Hirch (37)
- Artby - Randolph Bowers (1)
- Artby - Rudolph Ryser (74)
- Arts and Culture (35)
- Daily (398)
- Economy (14)
- Environment (25)
- FW Geo-Politics (41)
- Health (17)
- Human Rights (8)
- Law & Justice (5)
- Media (5)
- People (12)
- Political (24)
- Political Economy (12)
Latest Postings
- November 19, 2008: Essential Allies
- November 18, 2008: Illustrating Subsidiarity
- November 17, 2008: Human Rights
- November 16, 2008: Surmounting Poverty
- November 15, 2008: Supply and Demand
- November 14, 2008: Great White North
- November 14, 2008: Berlin Beckons
- November 14, 2008: Building Solidarity
- November 13, 2008: Smoke Him Out
- November 12, 2008: Without Their Consent
Links
Archives
Rationalizing Religious Racism
In this article, the authors, an American Indian and a New Zealand Maori, use a comparative law methodology to trace and compare the legal and historical application of the Doctrine of Discovery in both countries. The evidence uncovered helps to explain the current state of United States Indian law and New Zealand law relating to Maoris.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.