<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barbarity of Scientific Times</title>
	<link>http://fwe.cwis.org/2007/10/21/barbarity-of-scientific-times/</link>
	<description>An Online Daily Journal of the Center for World Indigenous Studies</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Taber</title>
		<link>http://fwe.cwis.org/2007/10/21/barbarity-of-scientific-times/#comment-81</link>
		<author>Jay Taber</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fwe.cwis.org/2007/10/21/barbarity-of-scientific-times/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>And yet, the order of knowledge in traditional medicine, as our colleague Anke Weisheit noted, is serious science. Trial and error, observation, and peer review outside the Western framework is still scientific. Integrated with societies over millenia, this system can hardly be said to be untested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet, the order of knowledge in traditional medicine, as our colleague Anke Weisheit noted, is serious science. Trial and error, observation, and peer review outside the Western framework is still scientific. Integrated with societies over millenia, this system can hardly be said to be untested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
